Skip to main content

Archives box 02

 Container

Contains 18 Results:

Program Review Self Studies

 Series — Multiple Containers
Scope and Contents This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 1970 - 2024

Program Review Self Study (2006) Appendix, 2006

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 1
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2006

Master’s Program Review (2007) , 2007

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 2
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2007

Master’s Program Review (2008) Narrative, 2008

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 3
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2008

Master’s Program Review (2008) Appendix 1, 2008

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 4
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2008

Master’s Program Review (2008) Appendix 2, 2008

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 5
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2008

Master’s Program Review (2008) Appendix 3, 2008

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 6
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2008

Master’s Program Review (2008) Appendix 4, 2008

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 7
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2008

Master’s Program Review (2008) Review Response, 2008

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 8
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2008

Master’s Program Review (2009) Narrative, 2009

 Item — archives box: 02, Folder: 9
Scope and Contents From the Series: This series consists of program reviews from the year 1975 when the program achieved its accreditation, through 2010. These program reviews encapsulate a variety of important information relating to the department. Their core components are missions and goals, curriculum reviews, assessment data, and faculty/staff lists, student trends, and community impact. Their intention is to assure quality control, continuous improvement, and accountability within the program. These program reviews help...
Dates: 2009